3 ms·
Ah I see... so it sounds like I misunderstood. You're calling for a higher-fidelity physical model, not something metaphysical :) I still think it's impressive
by mshroyer 5y ago
Ah I see... so it sounds like I misunderstood. You're calling for a higher-fidelity physical model, not something metaphysical :)
I still think it's impressive if we can get a decent-fidelity model of C. elegans behavior at the project's current level of abstraction.
I wonder how much behavioral difference we'd see from a lower level of simulation? After all, you can do a lot with a "RAM and CPU" level simulation of a computer...