>I would say that same side had some points a few years ago how all that mattered were the Swedish accusations and it was absurd to think they were just sham ac

>I would say that same side had some points a few years ago how all that mattered were the Swedish accusations and it was absurd to think they were just sham accusations to get Assange extradited. I would say that that side's naiveness and wishful thinking is actually harmful to justice as a higher concept. And what do the facts, evidence and rule of law say about those accusations?