3 ms·
I think the more "developing" or "relatively recenylu developed" nations who have university infastructure are more likely to go with the more European "paid to
by Nasrudith 5y ago
I think the more "developing" or "relatively recenylu developed" nations who have university infastructure are more likely to go with the more European "paid to be a student if you can pass the gatekeeping exams".
It has less to do with any ideology and more a combination of mathematics and pragmatism. Namely an insufficient number of people who could afford even free college from the opportunity cost of not working full time.
Even if the economy advanced enough that they could technically go to a more American model.
This is meant to be broad brush "first principles reasoning" and includes many disparate nations and situations. Some may also have a sufficient percentage from traditionally priveledged strata who could afford it. Often families who were traditional bureaucratic, military, or priestly occupations.
- nottorp 5y ago> the more European "paid to be a student if you can pass the gatekeeping exams". I don't think it goes up to "paid to be a student" most of the time. If you're not lucky enough to have local universities on your chosen subject you still have to pay for (possibly cheap student) lodging. Said gatekeeping exams may also be an extra cost if you need to pay someone to prepare for them. However, the financial burden overall is much smaller.