> And if some future ruler decided that meat is to be banned, what would you think of activists opposing that? I'd become an emigrant, activist, or terrorist.

> And if some future ruler decided that meat is to be banned, what would you think of activists opposing that? I'd become an emigrant, activist, or terrorist. > Or is it the idea of the stereotyped hippy/conspiracy theorist whacko as the 'activist' you oppose? No, I just don't care for activists in the general sense. I'd prefer to live in a generally liberal nation with some form of hegemony again, rather than miring through constant quibbling over every topic with the ultimate cause of disagreement being fundamental differences in belief.