4 ms·
I don't know if it's a snark. It's probably the right thing to provide legally. It's literally the records they have.
by hsn915 5y ago
I don't know if it's a snark. It's probably the right thing to provide legally. It's literally the records they have.
- JustSomeNobody 5y agoI would agree. If you're saying this is the only data I have, give it in the exact form you have it in.
- godelski 5y agoNot only all the records that they have, but it proves that the data isn't meaningful to de-anonymize someone. If they had to redact it we would wonder why and how that information would be useful.
- mminer237 5y agoThe standard is that you "must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms." It's probably fine here, but if you store it in binary, you should probably parse it into something human-readable.
- monopoledance 5y agoThe snark is publishing it in the blog post not blacked out. As a side effect the account may or not be warned by this. Not sure, if it’s legal to do so, in the US.