4 ms·
If you're suggesting that by "you", you meant "The overwhelming majority of people who set up ipads", that doesn't sound like a very credible retroactive explan
by ImPostingOnHN 5y ago
If you're suggesting that by "you", you meant "The overwhelming majority of people who set up ipads", that doesn't sound like a very credible retroactive explanation.
Like, it's confusing for sure, but not on the part of the reader. It doesn't even make sense. Most people don't even _have_ ipads.
And even if they did, you're basically saying, "this small subset of self-selecting people who are okay with their tablet requiring a login to work, are okay with their devices requiring a login to work", which isn't very convincing to others, either.
And even if _that_ made sense, 'these other people are okay with it' is probably one of the weakest possible arguments in favor of /anything/.
- jensensbutton 5y ago> this small subset of self-selecting people who are okay with their tablet requiring a login to work, are okay with their devices requiring a login to work I'll go ahead and assume English isn't your first language. I was saying the vast majority of people who own ipads are fine with needing to login to an account to get the most out of it. Doesn't seem like a particularly controversial statement. Now go ahead and find some way in which the above sentence is technically incorrect, but you're starting to look silly.
- ImPostingOnHN 5y agoHow does the statement "the vast majority of people who own ipads are fine with needing to log into their device" convince those who do not, and are not?