3 ms·
I presume that this is facetious, but it's not too far off the mark. See this other great Nuclear Secrecy blog post, "In Search of a Bigger Boom": http://blog.
by philipkglass 5y ago
I presume that this is facetious, but it's not too far off the mark. See this other great Nuclear Secrecy blog post, "In Search of a Bigger Boom":
http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/09/12/in-search-of-a-bigger-boom/ http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/09/12/in-search-of-a-big...
The scientist Edward Teller, according to one account, kept a blackboard in his office at Los Alamos during World War II with a list of hypothetical nuclear weapons on it. The last item on his list was the largest one he could imagine. The method of “delivery” — weapon-designer jargon for how you get your bomb from here to there, the target — was listed as “Backyard.” As the scientist who related this anecdote explained, “since that particular design would probably kill everyone on Earth, there was no use carting it anywhere.”
- dandotway 5y agoI guess "truth is stranger than fiction." ;-) Blog comment from the link you posted: The 10GT weapon really would have been BACKYARD. At 6MT/tonne (the upper bound for thermonuclear weapons) it would have weighed 1667 tonnes.
- DuskStar 5y agoWhen your nuke uses kilotons as a pre-detonation measure of weight, you've done something wrong.