> A person shouldn't be subject to seizure of their savings just because they're a little different than most in the handling of their finances. I agree, that

> A person shouldn't be subject to seizure of their savings just because they're a little different than most in the handling of their finances. I agree, that was the whole point of my comment. > I might be OK with the warrant you describe, but that's not what this was. I know, that's why I presented hypothetical alternative actions law enforcement could have taken, as a thought experiment. At the root of the issue is this: absent explicit evidence of a crime, should possession of arbitrary amounts of cash be considered suspect? Suppose he'd been pulled over with 2 million dollars cash in a truck and said he'd intended to use it to buy a mansion but the transaction fell through. How should law enforcement respond? Is there any amount of cash where you'd say "Something isn't right here"?