Sorry for replying with such a short response but your entire post seems to be based on this assertion: > Say you had a 10 unit apartment building that is impo

Sorry for replying with such a short response but your entire post seems to be based on this assertion: > Say you had a 10 unit apartment building that is impossible to own Nothing about this would make a 10-unit apartment building "impossible to own" (unless you're assuming that owning 10-unit apartment buildings is only feasible at scale.) The individual rental units are not the "property"; the land and building(s) are. Obviously, serious consideration of this proposal would need to round up a lot of numbers to determine the scale of your "Big Shuffle".