3 ms·
> Drug-sniffing dogs were called in, and they detected the presence of drugs on some of the money Of course they were called in, they knew money often has drug
by rdtsc 5y ago
> Drug-sniffing dogs were called in, and they detected the presence of drugs on some of the money
Of course they were called in, they knew money often has drug residue on it and those dogs will be guaranteed to find something.
> In addition to returning all of the seized money – $28,180 – prosecutors agreed to dismiss the case against him with prejudice, meaning they cannot go after the money at a later date. As part of the deal, Warren agreed not to pursue legal action against the government
They don't want any precedents to get in the way in the future. Can someone else pursue legal action instead? Say, his family as they were deprived of it as well?
- kevin_thibedeau 5y ago> money often has drug residue on it All money that's been in circulation has drug residue on it. Courts should not be admitting that as evidence.
- stavros 5y agoI think that was the GP's point.