3 ms·
I like your line of reasoning, however, apparently the mechanism the attacker used was patched. According to your logic, this is the fundamental design of the s
by sulam 5y ago
I like your line of reasoning, however, apparently the mechanism the attacker used was patched. According to your logic, this is the fundamental design of the system, and should be impossible to patch. That makes me more inclined toward the belief that this was a bug in their code.
- idiotsecant 5y agoThe patch changed the design of the system. They obviously didn't forsee the flaw in their system but it's not like someone found a buffer overflow - they only used the levers and buttons that the system provided them to perform this 'attack'.
- weq 5y agoIf u take money from an open bank door, u aint gonna be waved off with a laugh and good day. Just because u picked the lock using the mechanisms provided, doesnt mean u didnt steal the bounty. Code is law will only lead to SkyNet.