3 ms·
The real question here is if most states would even want that. Despite the downsides of the national government, there's a lot of benefits as well. As a newly f
by antasvara 5y ago
The real question here is if most states would even want that. Despite the downsides of the national government, there's a lot of benefits as well. As a newly formed country, a state would have to fund a military, pay for infrastructure currently paid for by the US government, devise their own type of social security (or not, but that money would be lost to the union that is left), ensure that the citizen's money is held in banks in the given state, create new passports, grow their own food or otherwise negotiate trade agreements, etc.
- krapp 5y agoYeah, there's a reason Texas threatens to secede every now and then but never actually does. Most American states have nothing to offer the world as independent nations and nothing to gain versus being part of the world's last superpower, assuming they could even operate as such after so many years of deeply integrated Federalism.