This article is bullshit. I'm sorry but it really, truly is. I've noticed a trend here on HN that more and more of these inane articles are appearing, labellin

This article is bullshit. I'm sorry but it really, truly is. I've noticed a trend here on HN that more and more of these inane articles are appearing, labelling some group and then stereotypically applying properties to the people in them. This one is the worst. Every line is a blatant lie, pulled from thin air or just a single experience the author once had. It's obvious that he has no clue. Why does the article get 50 points? It should be flagged.