4 ms·
Great point! I think I briefly mentioned it in my post, but I think that maybe there's three separate categories that I'm talking about. - Real-time communicat
by quadrifoliate 5y ago
Great point! I think I briefly mentioned it in my post, but I think that maybe there's three separate categories that I'm talking about.
- Real-time communication in person (face-to-face)
- Real-time communication remotely
- Asynchronous communication remotely
The scenario you mention "gets asked something but doesn't reply until at least two others pester him via phone repeatedly” seems to be in the category "Real-time communication remotely" (phone is real time, but remote). I think that area is problematic too, as my post points out.
Overall, I guess my experience has been that asynchronous communication remotely and real-time communication in person are both better than real-time communication remotely (aka "endless Zoom calls"). Real-time in person seems to have more feedback loops where someone who is badly behaved faces social consequences (e.g. not invited to lunch, etc.); and asynchronous remote seems to prevent it a little by giving everyone an equal amount of space to express their thoughts.
But overall, yep, I think all of these are assuming less-than-ideal coworkers. But...that's reality, isn't it? With perfectly behaved coworkers, all three options can work perfectly.
- captainredbeard 5y agoNonsense, asynchronous / remote comm just optimizes for people who live online. They can respond faster leading to an initiative advantage which was previously restricted to “egoists”, as you put it.