It's kind of the same argument for/against a universal programming language. The sheer creativity of all the peoples working in the same language, eclipsing the

It's kind of the same argument for/against a universal programming language. The sheer creativity of all the peoples working in the same language, eclipsing the few lost concepts we are unable to represent with our current model. If we want a robust model, we have to include uncertainty within it. As long as computers fail by being sure about the error, a human is always needed to fix the problem. It would have to be an almost philosophically mathematical standard. How we do that when half the world measures physics by completely different metrics than the other one? At least we have Unicode. God bless Unicode. Solving the problem from a computer-linguistic viewpoint: Let's get the language into the computer and we can worry about what it means later!