10 ms·

Are you implying that he knew about the controversy happening months ago when all this was planned & announced? Seems to me they could've handeled it a bit be

• scoofy 5y ago
  If you know of any "months ago" timeline for this that isn't from a facebook marketing person, then I'd like to know about it. The Facebook Files were published in September, and the WSJ was likely working on the story for months before then. Are you implying that Facebook wasn't informed, asked to verify, or asked to comment on the publication of it's internal documents months ago?
  • lrae 5y ago
    Funny that I have to proof things when you're the one with the initial claim without any proof. * But sure, let's start with to things. Right here in the thread, people who have acquaintances working for the original meta ulc under the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and them claiming they knew something is happening for months. * The meta trademark transfer months ago Also not sure why you think WSJ would contact them months before about/with a whistleblower. But I'm sure WSJ stated that somewhere then, right? It was also pretty likely that this would be announced during Facebook Connect (former Oculus Connect), which always was around this time the last couple of years. Was it still a welcome coincidence and convenient? Sure. And did they use it for that? Of course, too. Who wouldn't. So for example, a BS narrative that worked was Zuckerberg claiming a week? before that he wasn't sure about the new name yet and that it wasn't set in stone yet. That was indeed eaten up by some media.