3 ms·
To answer your last point - it’s not IPv6’s fault but ISP’s. In most of the EU it’s trivial to get even more than one static v6 prefix and I wish I didn’t have
by nrabulinski 5y ago
To answer your last point - it’s not IPv6’s fault but ISP’s. In most of the EU it’s trivial to get even more than one static v6 prefix and I wish I didn’t have to deal with NAT or even double NAT as it’s more and more common and instead could just run v6 only.
- slownews45 5y agoAwesome! I'm in the US. I gave up on some SIP/VOIP stuff because this (and other protocols) generate lag etc when you are going device > NAT > server > NAT > device route, vs device to device. I just need ONE prefix, but a group of 5 or 8 would be amazing (then you could use the default IPv6 scheme for addressing things). Maybe there is hope, the US lags in some of this a fair bit. There should be enough space it would seem.