I can't say for sure on this particular case, but the usual reasoning is this: Using Newtonian Mechanics (I'll skip the derivation.) you can calculate escape v

I can't say for sure on this particular case, but the usual reasoning is this: Using Newtonian Mechanics (I'll skip the derivation.) you can calculate escape velocity as follows: v = sqrt(2GM / r) r is the distance to the center of mass, G is the usual gravitational constant and M is the mass of the body. So, now we can reason about an object whose escape velocity is c. c^2 = 2GM / r and rearranging a bit: r* = 2GM / c^2. Thus, IF we packed a mass M into the radius r*, we would have a Newtonian blackhole. It turns out, quite incredibly, that this r* is in perfect agreement with the swarzchild radius from a non-rotating blackhole calculated using general relativity. Exactly why these two are in such agreement has never been explained to me other than as a coincidence. But it's quite incredible since usually r^3 terms pop up prior to the event horizon (at the same radius) which make GR make different predictions about orbits. (Such as the precession of mercury)