3 ms·
And yet they destabilized things by adding the deprecation/trying to get rid of it. And what even was the point of that?
by overgard 5y ago
And yet they destabilized things by adding the deprecation/trying to get rid of it. And what even was the point of that?
- Rygian 5y agoThey<the package maintainer> ≠ They<the committee>
- 2muchcoffeeman 5y agoThey also mentioned how this could happen at the end of the article. In the end they are working on a distro with certain ideals and this illustrates how they can achieve things with their ideals in mind.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- assbuttbuttass 5y agoOnly in unstable
- jjoonathan 5y agoThey destabilize it less than other packaging ecosystems. I tried Manjaro the other day -- out of the box, wake from sleep was broken, bluetooth was broken, and 3/3 printers were broken. I eventually got sleep working with an older kernel version, I got bluetooth working with config file hacking, and I got the printers working with CUPS wrangling -- but on Ubuntu, all of this Just Worked for me. That's the point of it.
- overgard 5y agoI don't see how deprecating "which" helps any of that, or any stability in general.
- cpuguy83 5y agoOn Debian "unstable".