3 ms·
Later caselaw (note that that case was from 1919) gives directors widespread latitude to decide what "benefiting the corporation" means. The second paragraph g
by likpok 5y ago
Later caselaw (note that that case was from 1919) gives directors widespread latitude to decide what "benefiting the corporation" means.
The second paragraph gives two such cases: AP Smith Manufacturing Co v. Barlow and Shlensky v. Wrigley.
- cma 5y agoThis actually just makes it worse if (plausible) Zuck is a sadist.