5 ms·
Why would you browse for what EST mean if you can simply open confirmation link and see if it works? But the suggestions overall are valid - thanks! What's be
by dennisgorelik 15y ago
Why would you browse for what EST mean if you can simply open confirmation link and see if it works?
But the suggestions overall are valid - thanks!
What's better:
1) "The link will expire 2011 August 19"
2) "The link is valid until 2011 August 19"
3) "The link is valid for one day until 2011 August 19"?
- xom 15y ago"valid through August 19"
- metageek 15y agoRight. "Through" is better than "until" because "until" leaves the reader unsure whether it includes August 19th. And 2011 is unnecessary; if someone does find an old message, they can look at the Date: header. Personally, I would say "August 19th", not "19".
- grecy 15y agoI've always found "through" to be confusing when used like this. It's like the whole "Next Friday" thing - is that the one about to happen (it's the "next" one to occur), or is it the one after that? (in Australia, it's usually the later) I much prefer "valid until August 19" (I'm a native English speaker, not from the US where "through" seems more common)
- reemrevnivek 15y agoAgreed, especially with the dropped year. If the duration is less than three months, the year can be inferred from the date of the email.
- mdda 15y ago"The link will expire after August 19" This gives people a sense of urgency, but doesn't discourage them from trying the link if they're a little late. "Through" is (to my ears) an Americanism.