3 ms·
Is there a reason we wouldn’t limit the incentives to the first 2-3 kids?
by arrosenberg 5y ago
Is there a reason we wouldn’t limit the incentives to the first 2-3 kids?
- dlp211 5y agoBecause the credits come no where near close enough to cover the actual expenses of having kids and this constant means testing makes programs harder and more expensive to enforce, and very few people are having kids to get credits and the credits are designed to ensure that those children have some sane baseline of support?
- TheCoelacanth 5y agoBecause children shouldn't grow up in poverty regardless of how many siblings they have.