We've been _under_ investing in scientific research, especially in regards to space, for decades. What spending we do have is usually focused on militaristic a

We've been _under_ investing in scientific research, especially in regards to space, for decades. What spending we do have is usually focused on militaristic applications. How does this reflect poorly on space travel research? If you're using the current status quo to argue that spending priorities are broken, you're not arguing against NASA funding. You're arguing against the military-industrial complex. If important research is done through public agencies, the public reaps the benefits of this research. If private industry is allowed to take the reins, corporate interests and shareholders are the ones who benefit.