4 ms·
I agree DDD doesn't belong in this list, but this seems a little harsh. Form follows function. DDD is more about understanding the function, and then architectu
by lyjackal 5y ago
I agree DDD doesn't belong in this list, but this seems a little harsh. Form follows function. DDD is more about understanding the function, and then architecture patterns are the form
- marginalia_nu 5y agoDDD works well enough for translating a business domain to computer code, and if your main obstacle is byzantine business requirements it's great, but I wouldn't want to develop something like an MPEG encoder or an operating system based on that principle. They have quite different types of difficulties that don't benefit from DDD.