> Neither poster cited anything though, so they both could be making shit up. Why not accuse both of propaganda techniques? I suppose it would be easier to jus

> Neither poster cited anything though, so they both could be making shit up. Why not accuse both of propaganda techniques? I suppose it would be easier to just point out a single paper out of said 60 that supported the thesis that ivermectin works. Somehow, in spite of the claim that there are so many papers, it seems it's impossible to actually find a single one that does support the claim.