> So you start by accusing him of being purposely misleading. He mentions 60 studies I did more than that: I pointed out not only the use of weasel words but a

> So you start by accusing him of being purposely misleading. He mentions 60 studies I did more than that: I pointed out not only the use of weasel words but also that no assertion is substantiated in what boils down to a baseless appeal to authority. Consequently, it's critical that, for the sake of objectiveness and to avoid spreading misinformation, these personal assertions cannot be backed up by handwaving and instead must be supported by concrete evidence, such as references to said studies, if they exist at all.