3 ms·

I don't agree... I think it's better to have good content in the sites I visit, than to get less than a few seconds a day back for downmodding links. I prefer g

by hhm 18y ago

I don't agree... I think it's better to have good content in the sites I visit, than to get less than a few seconds a day back for downmodding links. I prefer going to a good library, with many good chosen titles, than to a terrible library, where I have to do the full filtering myself, wasting more of my time by reading tons of useless book titles only to get one or two good ones.

raganwald 18y ago
It's not obvious to me that if everyone has a downmod button the library will be better. Somebody is upmodding books you don't like. How do you know they aren't downmodding the books you like? I suggest that if the library has a few titles you don't like, going without a downmod button is a good thing, just ignore them and move along. But if the library is overrun with bad titles, giving everyone a downmod button won't solve the problem, because the problem is caused by the librarians.
- hhm 18y ago
  Now, that's a good argument for not having a downmod button. But not having a downmod button for avoiding wasting the people energy? That's what I don't agree with.
  - raganwald 18y ago
    Well, the two motivations are orthogonal and neither is really right or wrong. So I can appreciate your point of view.
    - hhm 18y ago
      My point of view is that I only care about the quality of articles on the front page. If a downmod button would increase it, I would agree with such proposal, but I'm not sure (as you said) that such would be the case, and anyway I think the flag button does already work in a way like a big down button. What I do believe is that content can get better if people actively submit more articles (so spending a little more energy in the site), not only by voting the articles in the new queue. Anyway I have the feeling that the quality of articles in the site isn't always getting worse... these days I'm quite happy about it.

by hhm 18y ago

raganwald 18y ago

It's not obvious to me that if everyone has a downmod button the library will be better. Somebody is upmodding books you don't like. How do you know they aren't downmodding the books you like? I suggest that if the library has a few titles you don't like, going without a downmod button is a good thing, just ignore them and move along. But if the library is overrun with bad titles, giving everyone a downmod button won't solve the problem, because the problem is caused by the librarians.

hhm 18y ago
Now, that's a good argument for not having a downmod button. But not having a downmod button for avoiding wasting the people energy? That's what I don't agree with.
- raganwald 18y ago
  Well, the two motivations are orthogonal and neither is really right or wrong. So I can appreciate your point of view.
  - hhm 18y ago
    My point of view is that I only care about the quality of articles on the front page. If a downmod button would increase it, I would agree with such proposal, but I'm not sure (as you said) that such would be the case, and anyway I think the flag button does already work in a way like a big down button. What I do believe is that content can get better if people actively submit more articles (so spending a little more energy in the site), not only by voting the articles in the new queue. Anyway I have the feeling that the quality of articles in the site isn't always getting worse... these days I'm quite happy about it.