3 ms·

I'm curious what alternative you suggest to amplification. What, in your opinion, is a better non-bandaid solution?

marvin 5y ago
It’s obviously not feasible, or we would be doing it, but healing the damage that has happened would be the ideal solution.
adrianN 5y ago
We understand hearing well enough to attach devices directly to the relevant nerves and make the brain believe that the signals are coming from the ears. Unfortunately these devices are still really bad compared to natural hearing (or even hearing with hearing aids).
Joakal 5y ago
Hearing aids are designed to increase sound where the person can't hear as well. Sounds are faint? Hearing aid is a good choice. No therapy needed. Downsides is it that it amplifies noise too, requires batteries, maintenance. Cochlear implant are designed with electrical signals directly to nerves but needs therapy to understand. Its akin to a legless person learning to walk again with new metal legs. Has similar issues as above with noise, etc, but the nerves are stimulated directly which allows more accurate hearing but not 100%. A major downside is that you lose 100% natural hearing in that ear as the nerve stimulation wires go inside the cochlear, effectively blocking any sound from going in. So imagine you lose a foot, and they offer you a metal leg to walk again and that requires therapy. Its a tough choice for some: some natural hearing or accurate but stimulated hearing. Then the ear implant. Or really a natural cochlear implant is akin to attaching a new human leg to a legless person. Still, there's therapy needed. However, the cochlear is around the skull. So it's not as simple as taking it out and reattaching it. A lot of research is being done with promising results. Later, the bionic cochlear, a complete electrical replacement of cochlear where you hear as well as a dog, but that's a dream.
julianlam 5y ago
The underlying issue is that either the hair cells stopped working, or the auditory nerve is damaged in some way. The ideal solution would be to repair the hair cells or replace them with a drop-in solution that restores their function. Likewise with the auditory nerve. Of course, these are pie-in-the-sky ideas currently. Sound amplification essentially symptomatically resolves the problem by playing the appropriate frequencies louder, but in the case of hearing loss due to damage, amplification would just exacerbate the problem, unless I am fundamentally misunderstanding something. In layman's terms, it would be like temporarily losing your hearing by going to a rock concert, and then raising the volume of everything around you to rock concert level, so you can continue to hear things.

It’s obviously not feasible, or we would be doing it, but healing the damage that has happened would be the ideal solution.

adrianN 5y ago

We understand hearing well enough to attach devices directly to the relevant nerves and make the brain believe that the signals are coming from the ears. Unfortunately these devices are still really bad compared to natural hearing (or even hearing with hearing aids).

Joakal 5y ago

Hearing aids are designed to increase sound where the person can't hear as well. Sounds are faint? Hearing aid is a good choice. No therapy needed. Downsides is it that it amplifies noise too, requires batteries, maintenance. Cochlear implant are designed with electrical signals directly to nerves but needs therapy to understand. Its akin to a legless person learning to walk again with new metal legs. Has similar issues as above with noise, etc, but the nerves are stimulated directly which allows more accurate hearing but not 100%. A major downside is that you lose 100% natural hearing in that ear as the nerve stimulation wires go inside the cochlear, effectively blocking any sound from going in. So imagine you lose a foot, and they offer you a metal leg to walk again and that requires therapy. Its a tough choice for some: some natural hearing or accurate but stimulated hearing. Then the ear implant. Or really a natural cochlear implant is akin to attaching a new human leg to a legless person. Still, there's therapy needed. However, the cochlear is around the skull. So it's not as simple as taking it out and reattaching it. A lot of research is being done with promising results. Later, the bionic cochlear, a complete electrical replacement of cochlear where you hear as well as a dog, but that's a dream.

julianlam 5y ago

The underlying issue is that either the hair cells stopped working, or the auditory nerve is damaged in some way. The ideal solution would be to repair the hair cells or replace them with a drop-in solution that restores their function. Likewise with the auditory nerve. Of course, these are pie-in-the-sky ideas currently. Sound amplification essentially symptomatically resolves the problem by playing the appropriate frequencies louder, but in the case of hearing loss due to damage, amplification would just exacerbate the problem, unless I am fundamentally misunderstanding something. In layman's terms, it would be like temporarily losing your hearing by going to a rock concert, and then raising the volume of everything around you to rock concert level, so you can continue to hear things.