3 ms·
What’s even more consistent is using juxtaposition to represent all parameterization, on the value and type levels. Haskell does this!
by thewakalix 5y ago
What’s even more consistent is using juxtaposition to represent all parameterization, on the value and type levels. Haskell does this!
- edflsafoiewq 5y agoThat errs to the side of too much consistency for me. I'd like a nice balance; a small amount of syntax... but not too small. After all, morally x.a, x[a], and x(a) are all the same thing.