3 ms·
Yes this is cool. But c’mon — these scientists should know better (correlation vs. causation, yada yada). Humans have always believed that their current state
by purplepatrick 5y ago
Yes this is cool. But c’mon — these scientists should know better (correlation vs. causation, yada yada).
Humans have always believed that their current state of technology reflects how the brain works — clay pots and waterworks, electric circuits, cogs, etc. Just because there’s an “I” in AI and a “neural” in front of “network” doesn’t mean you’re not just mimicking something as opposed to replicating how it actually works…
- spurgu 5y agoSo then just assume that this is the next step towards the unattainable (during which endeavour we'll discover something better(?)) and go with it? :) I am drawing conclusions here but it seems to me you're implying that simulating the human mind is unattainable, while I'm arguing that you're possibly right, but that in the process we'll find something that could be even better (and/or cause our own doom).