3 ms·
Companies don’t do this anymore because S&P and other index creators will refuse to add your company to their indexes if you have multiple share classes. It’s m
by quickthrowman 5y ago
Companies don’t do this anymore because S&P and other index creators will refuse to add your company to their indexes if you have multiple share classes. It’s much better to be part of an index than to retain founder control, for shareholders.
https://www.ft.com/content/993e4c11-8729-3168-a280-69e1d400b1bc https://www.ft.com/content/993e4c11-8729-3168-a280-69e1d400b...
- dannyw 5y agoPlenty of IPOs this year had dual class shares (~20% I believe). Founders are often billionaires; money is now measured in log terms, but control is a boolean. If they already have control, they'll want to keep that control. Investors (VC, etc) have made 20x or more on their investment already and no one is going to go on a fight with successful founders, for a variety of reasons but primarily, they don't care how a company performs in the long run because their fund has already sold their stake and closed already.
- dsizzle 5y agoThe price boost from being added to the S&P is temporary and small (~5%) https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/spphenomenon.asp https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/spphenomenon.asp The person controlling the company potentially has a much greater and longer lasting influence on the stock price! Epic isn't going to be part of the S&P when it's private anyway, so obviously that's not a top concern for Sweeney.