4 ms·
Well I only mentioned the McDonald’s case because of the similar public relations attack by the food industry, you are trying to distinguish the damages. If yo
by throwawaycities 5y ago
Well I only mentioned the McDonald’s case because of the similar public relations attack by the food industry, you are trying to distinguish the damages.
If you actually read the complaint then you wouldn’t try comparing the damages resulting from a negligence case and this case for:
1. Violation of the NY consumer statue act;
2. Negligent misrepresentation;
3. Breach of implied merchantability; and
4. Unjust enrichment.
Also please cite from the complaint exactly where you got you initial quotation that the plaintiffs “thought pop tarts would prevent cancer.” Or why you would have made that up after reading the complaint?