3 ms·

So one argument against code coverage requirements is that poor engineers won't test correctly. Without the code coverage requirements you're in the same situat

• crysin 5y ago
  Problem is with 100% code coverage of badly guarded / implemented code you'll have a fall sense of security if you're just looking at coverage as the metric of quality. Anytime I've worked with a company who had a required code coverage percent, they never actually cared what the code being covered looked like only that it was covered in some test.
• manquer 5y ago
  Without going down the rabbit hole of Goodhart's law, code coverage % is a poor metric particularly when used standalone.