4 ms·
I tried it on IntelliJ recently. The examples I tested blew my mind. Yet, I think there are two things that need to improve to get me to use it regularly (it wi
by parhamn 5y ago
I tried it on IntelliJ recently. The examples I tested blew my mind. Yet, I think there are two things that need to improve to get me to use it regularly (it will get there!):
- less than perfect import/types/var suggestions that LSP in typed languages would've made perfect suggestions for (e.g named import in go would use the package name instead).
- latency feels a bit high and my thoughts would get interrupted waiting for a suggestion to come.
For the former, I wonder hard feasible it would be to give structured suggestions to the LSPs that it would swap for correct var names and imports and such. Or test each suggestion with the LSP for error counts and offer the least erroring suggestion.
- sillysaurusx 5y ago> latency feels a bit high and my thoughts would get interrupted waiting for a suggestion to come. How high? That's interesting.
- baby 5y agoI haven't had problem with the latency personally