3 ms·
I mean 6% of GDP is a lot, obviously, but it's also just as obviously a cost that can be paid. The important questions are: - Is it more expensive than simply
by s17n 5y ago
I mean 6% of GDP is a lot, obviously, but it's also just as obviously a cost that can be paid. The important questions are:
- Is it more expensive than simply reducing emissions?
- Is it easier (politically or economically) to deploy?
I see no reason to believe that development of carbon removal tech has had any impact on CO2 emission reduction efforts.
- mijamo 5y agoI have. Many political parties are trying to aim at carbon neutrality nearly only through carbon removal and technological improvements in efficiency. This is actually a huge point of debate in a lot of countries.