3 ms·
There's no point in reasoning with you, if you believe that someone's private health information is a blanket reason to completely ruin their livelihood. Would
by sgjohnson 5y ago
There's no point in reasoning with you, if you believe that someone's private health information is a blanket reason to completely ruin their livelihood.
Would be lovely if you were put in a position where it's something you don't want to (or can't) do, or your own government takes away your entire livelihood. But it would be fine, because that's how civilisation works, through society making decisions on whats acceptable and what isn't. There's all sorts of sensible.
I would have a sweet, sweet "I told you so" moment, but I would still stand up for your rights.
- malermeister 5y agoThat "private health information" is them attempting to ruin other people's livelihoods. This isn't some personal issue like high blood pressure, this is a highly infectious disease. Stop pretending this is some kind of principled stand, it's just people wanting to be inconsiderate assholes and other people not wanting them to be.
- sgjohnson 5y agoUnvaccinated people aren't runing anyone's livelihood, except for taking a bigger risk on themselves. It is a principled stand. I'm all for vaccination and I'm vaccinated myself, I don't care who's vaccinated and who's not. Making it illegal to employ unvaccinated people is inexcuseable.
- malermeister 5y agoThis would be true if vaccines offered perfect 100% protection. Since they don't, individual protection is the product of the protection of everyone you interact with. As such, unvaccinated people are a health risk to the vaccinated individual. We don't allow all sorts of other health risks in the workplace, you can't be a drunk crane operator for example, so this is not some special new thing.