3 ms·
Huh. Wonder why the solution wasn't deemed to be getting rid of the problem person, if it was mostly isolated like that?
by burnished 5y ago
Huh. Wonder why the solution wasn't deemed to be getting rid of the problem person, if it was mostly isolated like that?
- lotsofpulp 5y agoBecause he has plausible deniability, and then you have to address exactly where the line is. And then you end up with bureaucracy. From every organization or tribe I have seen, it is basically inevitable. If they are lucky, the members of the organization continue to put the needs of all and long term interests over their own, and there are less resources needed to be spent on keeping people in line. Once a sufficient number of people decide to put their own needs and short term interests ahead of the others, then it becomes a never-ending game of whack a mole and politics and parties and all that fun stuff emerges. This happens on nation state levels, company level, small business, for fun sports organizations, and even family. It is a never-ending battle to keep the order and keep out/expel the entropy.