4 ms·
Especially since for anyone reading the article it's clear why she's (rightfully) annoyed. > She has only a handful of collars left. "I really am desperate," s
by junon 5y ago
Especially since for anyone reading the article it's clear why she's (rightfully) annoyed.
> She has only a handful of collars left. "I really am desperate," she says. "That's the most scary thing in my life right now — is not finding anybody that can make those collars."
Naomi does a lot of interesting work and is snubbed quite a lot. She made it quite public that this was happening and yet NPR still snubbed her.
- morelisp 5y agoI mean there's also plenty of other options, like the parts didn't fundamentally work and it's easier to just forget about it and write a new article than risk another media blowup by bringing a Twitter personality into a story that's not really about her?
- junon 5y agoThat makes absolutely zero sense, though. She's also not a twitter personality. She's a full-blown engineer with a very popular Youtube channel and following and has done these sorts of things quite often.
- morelisp 5y agoWhatever else she also is, she's absolutely a social media personality. > full-blown engineer This, I seriously doubt. As far as I know she's very deep in the DIY/maker scene, but I don't think she's been flashing around a PE cert. Or maybe we have a difference of opinion what a "full-blown engineer" is.
- vangelis 5y agoThere's a lot of engineers out there who wouldn't count as engineers by that metric.
- sho_hn 5y agoNaomi Wu is not a US citizen (the English name is a pseudonym). The NSPE is a US-only entity.
- brokensegue 5y agoi'm an engineer and i'm not even sure what "PE cert" stands for. certification means very litte.
- lapetitejort 5y agoA Professional Engineer certification can mean "We trust you to work on things where human lives may be at stake". Gatekeeping engineers use this to exclude everyone else. If your screw-up doesn't cost human lives then you're not a real engineer.
- junon 5y ago> If your screw-up doesn't cost human lives then you're not a real engineer. This is such a ridiculous, asinine, and outright wrong assertion that it warrants no reasoned response.
- dang 5y agoIn that case please follow the site guidelines, which ask you not to reply. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29023822 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29023822 also broke the site guidelines. That's not cool, regardless of how bad other comments are or you feel they are. Would you please review them and take the intended spirit of this place more to heart? We'd appreciate it.
- sho_hn 5y agoI'm fairly sure the post you're replying you was interpretative-facetious.
- junon 5y agoI got that, it was directed towards the engineers who act this way. I've met too many of them as well.
- anthk 5y ago
- masklinn 5y agoThat makes absolutely no sense, Wu is in china so some back and forth in order to get the collars to fit correctly is to be expected. Following which you're done because the chinese shop can make the collars to order whenever that's needed. > bringing a Twitter personality into a story that's not really about her? Wu was already involved in this. Per her comments she'd already sent packages of collars to be tested and altered / fitted. Hell, mentioning that there was a volunteer / grassroots effort to produce new collars would have been more honest than the article going "collars where?"
- morelisp 5y agoIt's a light human interest story, not a comprehensive international assessment of iron lungs parts suppliers or formal inventory and provenance check of Martha's stock.
- junon 5y ago> It's a light human interest story It's NPR. There's no excuse for poor sensationalist journalism even from them.
- morelisp 5y agoA brief retrospective of iron lungs and the technical difficulties faced by people who still prefer them is among the least sensationalist pieces of writing I can imagine. Where you normally get news that's so sedate by this standard?
- mrighele 5y agoShe has the right to be annoyed with those that were supposed to deliver and test the collars, not with Martha Lillard or NPR. From the point of view of M.L., she is maybe one of several that promised to help but could do it (not a fault of Naomi Wu of course, but of those that first contacted her for help and then left things unfinished), so it doesn't surprise me that she was not mentioned.
- junon 5y agoNPR asserted in their article that help was few and far in between when this wasn't the case. Naomi has certainly gone above and beyond in attempting to help. It should be noted that the difficulty is not in finding help, but in the logistics. It reads very much like a plea to emotion, how NPR worded it.
- Chris2048 5y agoDid Martha herself not reach out to Naomi? It would seem to make more sense to me than NPR doing so..