> I think they need stronger motivation. I've been using `exa` for over a year now, and I use it as an alias for both `ls` and `tree`. I don't really notice an

> I think they need stronger motivation. I've been using `exa` for over a year now, and I use it as an alias for both `ls` and `tree`. I don't really notice any benefit compared to using `ls`, but I really prefer its tree mode over the default `tree` command. It's nice being able to use the same CLI args and have a similar output format for both `tree` and `ls`.