You are correct in that it's not a feasible approach to neutralize emissions. But that's not why this tech is so important. We need it to undo the damage we've

You are correct in that it's not a feasible approach to neutralize emissions. But that's not why this tech is so important. We need it to undo the damage we've already done. Will it be expensive as hell? Probably. But we need to do it. And if we cut emissions hard and fast we won't need to do carbon removal in panic but can do it more slowly.