6 ms·

There is a long trail of dead startups attempting this. But don't let this dissuade you, please do a Show HN when you launch.

marginalia_nu 5y ago
Probably requires the technology to reach some tipping point. It was the same with VR and motion tracking. We've been able to do those things for nearly half a century, but it hasn't been anywhere near commercially viable until recently.
- fragmede 5y ago
  The tipping point is the availability of quality, affordable AR glasses. Until recently, AR has been too niche, so even if the acoustic camera technology is fine, the company also has to build AR glasses to go with the other part of the system. Whenever Apple comes out with AR glasses, then writing an acoustic camera app is almost trivial in comparison to having to also having to design some AR glasses. Not having to design the glasses makes acoustic camera technology overlay software way more commercially viable.
  - vdqtp3 5y ago
    > availability of quality, affordable AR glasses And since Intel, Google, Facebook etc keep buying startups that produce cool things and preventing them from producing more cool things (North Focals being the most recent I'm aware of) it's gonna be a while
    - Moru 5y ago
      And if someone actually makes something remotely useful and successful, Google or Amazon will create a direct competitor and totally run you over.
      - marginalia_nu 5y ago
        Seems like the scenario the patent system is supposed to prevent.
    - t-3 5y ago
      Epson and others are still going strong, but AR has been pigeonholed into drone piloting and industrial applications space for several years. The software ecosystem (especially compelling and usable interfaces for input and programming) is what's really lacking for broad adoption, the hardware works well and will only have incremental improvements and price reductions at this point.
      - vdqtp3 5y ago
        Are any of those accessible to hobbyists? As in, can I order a pair of glasses and have a reasonably open SDK?

marginalia_nu 5y ago

Probably requires the technology to reach some tipping point. It was the same with VR and motion tracking. We've been able to do those things for nearly half a century, but it hasn't been anywhere near commercially viable until recently.

fragmede 5y ago
The tipping point is the availability of quality, affordable AR glasses. Until recently, AR has been too niche, so even if the acoustic camera technology is fine, the company also has to build AR glasses to go with the other part of the system. Whenever Apple comes out with AR glasses, then writing an acoustic camera app is almost trivial in comparison to having to also having to design some AR glasses. Not having to design the glasses makes acoustic camera technology overlay software way more commercially viable.
- vdqtp3 5y ago
  > availability of quality, affordable AR glasses And since Intel, Google, Facebook etc keep buying startups that produce cool things and preventing them from producing more cool things (North Focals being the most recent I'm aware of) it's gonna be a while
  - Moru 5y ago
    And if someone actually makes something remotely useful and successful, Google or Amazon will create a direct competitor and totally run you over.
    - marginalia_nu 5y ago
      Seems like the scenario the patent system is supposed to prevent.
  - t-3 5y ago
    Epson and others are still going strong, but AR has been pigeonholed into drone piloting and industrial applications space for several years. The software ecosystem (especially compelling and usable interfaces for input and programming) is what's really lacking for broad adoption, the hardware works well and will only have incremental improvements and price reductions at this point.
    - vdqtp3 5y ago
      Are any of those accessible to hobbyists? As in, can I order a pair of glasses and have a reasonably open SDK?