I know you can file suit for pretty much anything, but at some point, but what expectation is there for the law to rule based on a woman's perception? It's quit

I know you can file suit for pretty much anything, but at some point, but what expectation is there for the law to rule based on a woman's perception? It's quite a big leap to prove damages from "I think strawberries will do X..." to "There aren't enough strawberries in this product to do X!". They don't even seem to be claiming that Kellogg contributed to this perception! The article talks about proper labeling and marketing, which is all well and good, but then, isn't that the jurisdiction of the FDA? This seems like a waste of time, but I guess if you file 2-3 $5MM lawsuits per week, you're bound to eventually win one of them. It just shows ways to exploit this legal system, I suppose.