3 ms·
> But that doesn’t still make the specification “standardised” for anyone else. Of course not, and no one has claimed that this is a globally recognized stand
by capableweb 5y ago
> But that doesn’t still make the specification “standardised” for anyone else.
Of course not, and no one has claimed that this is a globally recognized standard. The only thing that has been claimed is that they have standarized it for _themselves_.
It's important to get semantics right, and it's equally important to really read and understand what's being said, and not assume something "more" is being said than what is really said.
- laumars 5y ago> Of course not, and no one has claimed that this is a globally recognized standard. > > Reproducible Builds has standardized "SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH" for exactly this usecase. > It's important to get semantics right, and it's equally important to really read and understand what's being said I’d say either you’re wrong or the GP was unclear in his statement. Either way I don’t buy your attempt to shift the responsibility of error into me.