2 ms·
It’s universal portability, but at the cost of only using the lowest-common-denominator features of any random markdown implementation. There are so so many mor
by joppy 5y ago
It’s universal portability, but at the cost of only using the lowest-common-denominator features of any random markdown implementation. There are so so many more things that can be done with websites and long-form writing than big standard markdown, and even Pandoc (which I consider to be the most versatile fully-featured markdown implementation) has extensive support for user-written filters, which provide more on top of what Pandoc markdown provides.
What is the priority - being able to switch blog implementations at the drop of a hat, or having an actually good website?