4 ms·
all of that should reflect in economic indicators of parents and their say marital status/history etc... - you shouldn't need an imprecise proxy like race to le
by hawk_ 5y ago
all of that should reflect in economic indicators of parents and their say marital status/history etc... - you shouldn't need an imprecise proxy like race to level the playing field.
- CapitalistCartr 5y agoRace isn't a proxy, Marital status is. Race(ism) is the root problem. Even the kids of middle class and wealthy blacks suffer the same abuse by the white system.
- ravel-bar-foo 5y ago> Racism is the root problem. Is this a falsifiable hypothesis, or is it akin to Russel's teapot? In order to be meaningful, a statement must be falsifiable: What experiment could convince you that racism is not a root cause? I ask because it seems like whenever there is a racially polarized disparity in outcomes it is blamed on racism, no matter the polarity of the disparity, no matter whether race is really needed as part of the mechanism that creates the racial disparity. For example, gentrification in the United States is often attributed to systemic racism. However, despite only having one significant race, Korea and Japan also exhibit cycles of gentrification which harm the economic underclasses, completely independent of a "white system". So, have you looked at all the other potential root causes and ruled them out?
- infamia 5y agoThe system you're describing treats Sasha and Malia Obama as disadvantaged, while handicapping Hmong people because they're Asian. How can we assert that race is anything but a proxy when the system you're defending screws things up this badly? Race homogenizes unique individuals into vague, ill-fitting, predefined groups, and ultimately hammers many square pegs into round holes uncaring of the damage it causes.