> I haven't read the methods yet, but the idea that the authors were able to do this analysis is fascinating. Their work is nonsense. They assume address=singl

> I haven't read the methods yet, but the idea that the authors were able to do this analysis is fascinating. Their work is nonsense. They assume address=single investor, which is not the case. That large address that has hundreds of thousands of bitcoin on it? It could be a whale, sure. It could also be Bitfinex's cold storage wallet representing tens of thousands of individual investors.