4 ms·
It’s a lot more practical than you think if you’re willing to roll up your sleeve and do the work. Fortunately, people have already done the work for you. [1]
by reikonomusha 5y ago
It’s a lot more practical than you think if you’re willing to roll up your sleeve and do the work.
Fortunately, people have already done the work for you. [1]
[1] https://github.com/coalton-lang/coalton https://github.com/coalton-lang/coalton
- Zababa 5y agoI don't think it would be more practical than just using a typed language in the first place.
- spicybright 5y agoNot really getting the argument, the above lib pretty much makes it a superset that adds types. And while I don't know the scope of the library, if they have a way to not allow dynamic features then you're already starting from a having a typed language (with one library dependency). Only now you can keep building up the type system in ways that benefit your project, unlike in most non lisp languages.