4 ms·

>Would 100% move to Hawaii in the future I wish you best of luck in chasing your dream but I feel compelled to tell you that the word is that in non-tourist ar

>Would 100% move to Hawaii in the future I wish you best of luck in chasing your dream but I feel compelled to tell you that the word is that in non-tourist areas there is some pretty heavy racism going on against non-islanders. It is based on them (you) driving up property prices and basic goods availability. Maybe you already knew but still.

deathanatos 5y ago
> It is based on them (you) driving up property prices and basic goods availability. Sounds like where I am now. Near as I can tell, nobody wants my generation to settle anywhere, because we "drive up" property prices. Like we want to pay $1M for a home, or had any hand in the local zoning idiocracy.
- stavros 5y ago
  You don't want to, but you do. That's the problem.
  - deathanatos 5y ago
    At some point, there simply isn't going to be much choice; I have a job that now requires space for a home office, and at some point, a family will require space, and it can only be delayed so long. Rent goes up year after year without so much as skipping a beat for the pandemic, and so it might, in some ways, be nice to put that into equity — even equity that might crash — rather than just continuing to enrich my local landlords.
    - stavros 5y ago
      There isn't choice? That makes it sound like you're forced to spend 1M on a home. There are people with families and space requirement who don't even have 10k, let alone 1M. What choice do they have? The issue isn't that rich people buy homes in rich areas, it's that they buy homes in poor areas and poor people can no longer afford to.
      - ironmagma 5y ago
        Isn’t the issue equally that people (presumably poor people, since it’s poor neighborhoods) are selling their houses to rich buyers? It’s entirely possible to only sell to a poor person for a lower price.
      - blitzar 5y ago
        > That makes it sound like you're forced to spend 1M on a home No they are 'forced' to buy a home. The home that fulfills their needs is 1M. If they could find a home that fulfilled their needs for $5 and 10c they would spend $5.10 on their home. The 'poor' person who sold their house to them in the poor area for $1mil ('where back in my day a house cost nothing') now has $1mil. The 'rich' person has a mortgage.
        stavros 5y ago
        The poor person didn't have a house to sell. Poor people don't have assets. This discussion feels like talking to people from another reality. I live in a country where $900/mo is considered a good salary. New 120 m^2 flats in my city now cost $600k because people from abroad have come in, bought stuff and raised prices. What are regular people here, who have no "houses to sell", supposed to do? Move away from the place they've lived for decades because people from rich countries are "forced" to buy a home? Has nobody heard of gentrification?
        blitzar 5y ago
        > Poor people don't have assets. But they could afford before the gentrificaion. They were not buying assets when they could afford them, they certainly are not buying assets now that they can not afford them. As you have written them off as "poor" for all eternity then they will never be able to afford them. Therefore the purchase price of the property in question is entirely irrelevant to your poor person, those flats could be $6, $600k, or $6mil they are not buying them.
        spurgu 5y ago
        Yeah, the same thing has happened in Malta.
  - ironmagma 5y ago
    Demand is a group phenomenon; anyone who participates in the act of desiring a house drives up the prices. It’s not just the buyers, and certainly not just a particular age group of buyers.
  - saghm 5y ago
    The problem is people having the audacity to want to choose where they live and buy a house there? It was reasonable to do that if you were born more than 35 years ago, but if not, you're just out of luck?
    - stavros 5y ago
      No, that's perfectly sensible. Unless you were born in a poor area, I guess, in which case fuck you, you don't get to choose where to live OR buy a house there because all the rich people from out of town are driving you out of your own city. But that's fine, poor people shouldn't be alive anyway.
      - jklein11 5y ago
        > But that's fine, poor people shouldn't be alive anyway. I am glad that you are finally speaking sensibly. /s
      - blitzar 5y ago
        I was born and raised in a rich area. It is unfair that I can not get a 12 bedroom detached house on the upper west side of New York, where I was born and raised for $50,000. I demand someone gives it to me.
        roudaki 5y ago
        People always push the argument into extreme but for practical example you have housing around industrial zones going 250% up and being turned into gated communities and factories cant move because of nearby high way and harbor. So it is not socialism but common sense to call for residency zoning area reserved for workers. In tourist zones this is normal: from Alps to Mediterranean. But if you mention big cities suddenly nobody ever heard of workers working there only landlords and retail shops. And I am not talking across the street where you work I am talking 1h commute area around industrial zone rejecting cheap apartments and building gated communities where one foreign firm can buy all 128 houses at once. If we can talk against concert ticket/ps5/3070ti scalping and overcharging we can talk about housing without being mocked at and called greedy lazy socialist. I just dont wanna live in a shoe box or be 3h in traffic every day.
  - mvc 5y ago
    There's two sides to every transaction. Why blame only the buy side?
- alx__ 5y ago
  The folks driving up property prices are the speculators/flippers/airbnb buyers. Nothing wrong with moving into a space if you're going to live there full time.

deathanatos 5y ago

> It is based on them (you) driving up property prices and basic goods availability. Sounds like where I am now. Near as I can tell, nobody wants my generation to settle anywhere, because we "drive up" property prices. Like we want to pay $1M for a home, or had any hand in the local zoning idiocracy.

stavros 5y ago
You don't want to, but you do. That's the problem.
- deathanatos 5y ago
  At some point, there simply isn't going to be much choice; I have a job that now requires space for a home office, and at some point, a family will require space, and it can only be delayed so long. Rent goes up year after year without so much as skipping a beat for the pandemic, and so it might, in some ways, be nice to put that into equity — even equity that might crash — rather than just continuing to enrich my local landlords.
  - stavros 5y ago
    There isn't choice? That makes it sound like you're forced to spend 1M on a home. There are people with families and space requirement who don't even have 10k, let alone 1M. What choice do they have? The issue isn't that rich people buy homes in rich areas, it's that they buy homes in poor areas and poor people can no longer afford to.
    - ironmagma 5y ago
      Isn’t the issue equally that people (presumably poor people, since it’s poor neighborhoods) are selling their houses to rich buyers? It’s entirely possible to only sell to a poor person for a lower price.
    - blitzar 5y ago
      > That makes it sound like you're forced to spend 1M on a home No they are 'forced' to buy a home. The home that fulfills their needs is 1M. If they could find a home that fulfilled their needs for $5 and 10c they would spend $5.10 on their home. The 'poor' person who sold their house to them in the poor area for $1mil ('where back in my day a house cost nothing') now has $1mil. The 'rich' person has a mortgage.
      - stavros 5y ago
        The poor person didn't have a house to sell. Poor people don't have assets. This discussion feels like talking to people from another reality. I live in a country where $900/mo is considered a good salary. New 120 m^2 flats in my city now cost $600k because people from abroad have come in, bought stuff and raised prices. What are regular people here, who have no "houses to sell", supposed to do? Move away from the place they've lived for decades because people from rich countries are "forced" to buy a home? Has nobody heard of gentrification?
        blitzar 5y ago
        > Poor people don't have assets. But they could afford before the gentrificaion. They were not buying assets when they could afford them, they certainly are not buying assets now that they can not afford them. As you have written them off as "poor" for all eternity then they will never be able to afford them. Therefore the purchase price of the property in question is entirely irrelevant to your poor person, those flats could be $6, $600k, or $6mil they are not buying them.
        spurgu 5y ago
        Yeah, the same thing has happened in Malta.
- ironmagma 5y ago
  Demand is a group phenomenon; anyone who participates in the act of desiring a house drives up the prices. It’s not just the buyers, and certainly not just a particular age group of buyers.
- saghm 5y ago
  The problem is people having the audacity to want to choose where they live and buy a house there? It was reasonable to do that if you were born more than 35 years ago, but if not, you're just out of luck?
  - stavros 5y ago
    No, that's perfectly sensible. Unless you were born in a poor area, I guess, in which case fuck you, you don't get to choose where to live OR buy a house there because all the rich people from out of town are driving you out of your own city. But that's fine, poor people shouldn't be alive anyway.
    - jklein11 5y ago
      > But that's fine, poor people shouldn't be alive anyway. I am glad that you are finally speaking sensibly. /s
    - blitzar 5y ago
      I was born and raised in a rich area. It is unfair that I can not get a 12 bedroom detached house on the upper west side of New York, where I was born and raised for $50,000. I demand someone gives it to me.
      - roudaki 5y ago
        People always push the argument into extreme but for practical example you have housing around industrial zones going 250% up and being turned into gated communities and factories cant move because of nearby high way and harbor. So it is not socialism but common sense to call for residency zoning area reserved for workers. In tourist zones this is normal: from Alps to Mediterranean. But if you mention big cities suddenly nobody ever heard of workers working there only landlords and retail shops. And I am not talking across the street where you work I am talking 1h commute area around industrial zone rejecting cheap apartments and building gated communities where one foreign firm can buy all 128 houses at once. If we can talk against concert ticket/ps5/3070ti scalping and overcharging we can talk about housing without being mocked at and called greedy lazy socialist. I just dont wanna live in a shoe box or be 3h in traffic every day.
- mvc 5y ago
  There's two sides to every transaction. Why blame only the buy side?
alx__ 5y ago
The folks driving up property prices are the speculators/flippers/airbnb buyers. Nothing wrong with moving into a space if you're going to live there full time.