3 ms·
People are driven by biological impulses. It seems reasonable to me to want to protect yourself from your own future impulses. I remember reading about an expe
by lwouis 5y ago
People are driven by biological impulses. It seems reasonable to me to want to protect yourself from your own future impulses.
I remember reading about an experiment at Google where they reduced snacking by simply putting an opaque cover on the snacks. When people see chocolate bars, there is a chance they'll turn and get one. They may consider they made the decision rationally but they didn't.
In moments of rationality, it seems reasonable to me to devise and legislate ways to protect yourself from future impulses. It's a paradox for sure, but our impulsive/rationale nature is the source of the paradox, and is unavoidable.
When you "ask" the market by offering food, people may rush to the high-calory fastfood offerings. In a moment of reason, you may want to regulate this (e.g. ban fast food ads around kids), so that you don't live in an obese-ridden society.
- bserge 5y agoYeah, the primitive vs advanced brain struggle is real. Unfortunately it doesn't quite translate to social systems. In the quest for ever increasing safety, someone might ban tap water because one guy choked on it. That would be hilarious.
- Nasrudith 5y agoThat sounds a lot like consent manufacturing to me. "The Berlin Wall is to protect you from future impulses that could get you exploited by the bourgeoisie."