4 ms·
Hahaha of course not. I don't really propose an alternative. I'm just lamenting the situation and trying to provide context to the Element CEO about why the ori
by KAMSPioneer 5y ago
Hahaha of course not. I don't really propose an alternative. I'm just lamenting the situation and trying to provide context to the Element CEO about why the original commenter, and people like him, might not be 100% jazzed about the democratization of technology that, in terms of message _security_, is a step backwards.
Doesn't mean I'm in favor of such ridiculous things as you've suggested here.
- feanaro 5y ago> jazzed about the democratization of technology that, in terms of message _security_, is a step backwards. Well, you can always switch to Matrix and have democratized and secure native messaging which uses a cryptographic protocol comparable to Signal. ;)
- juliansark 5y agoMany of us have, and painfully if I might add, finally convinced people to abandon insecure messengers and move to something like Signal. Now the solution is to tell them to abandon Signal in favor of Matrix? I'll pass. Also, obligatory xkcd: https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards.png https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards.png
- feanaro 5y agoThe problem is Signal is not a standard unless they open up their ecosystem, so we're not actually increasing the number of standards here. I've been through the pain of convincing people to Signal due to lack of better alternatives at the time. And I've done it yet again for Matrix. In this case, each move brought us closer to a global optimum so I'm not sorry for it.